Let's Connect Contact
Home About Projects Contact

Decoclub

I conducted usability research on a two-sided remodeling marketplace to investigate why conversion rates were lower than expected. Through remote task-based testing, I identified friction in how users searched, compared, and evaluated options, leading to strategic recommendations focused on visual comparison and structured information.

Role UX Researcher & Designer
Timeline 3 weeks
Scope Usability testing, behavioral analysis, strategic recommendations

The Challenge

Unclear Conversion Barriers

DecoClub aimed to provide exclusive remodeling deals through a marketplace model. However, stakeholders lacked clarity around why users were not progressing toward contacting companies and requesting quotes.

The objective was to uncover behavioral friction points affecting decision-making and conversion.

Research & Insights

Structured Usability Evaluation

I conducted remote usability testing with five participants who had recently completed home remodeling projects. Participants were given realistic task scenarios, including:

  • Finding companies specializing in kitchen renovation
  • Comparing project options
  • Contacting a company to request a quote

I measured time-on-task, error/confusion rate, and qualitative reactions to evaluate usability and decision clarity.

1. Users Were Seeking Inspiration, Not Just Companies

Participants gravitated toward visuals and project examples rather than company listings. The platform was structured around company profiles, while users were trying to compare projects and materials.

2. Lack of Structured Comparison Signals

Information across company profiles was inconsistent and broad, making comparison difficult. Users often skipped written content and relied heavily on images to guide decisions.

3. Content Hierarchy Reduced Decision Confidence

Because descriptions varied in structure and depth, users struggled to evaluate credibility and differentiate offerings, leading some to leave the app and search externally.

Remote usability sessions — participants completing task-based scenarios

Quantitative Signals

Core tasks demonstrated elevated confusion rates and extended time-on-task, particularly when users attempted to compare options or request quotes. While most participants completed the tasks, the cognitive effort required indicated friction in the decision-making process.

Error/Confusion Rate

Confusion rate chart for Decoclub usability tasks

Time on Task

Time on task chart for Decoclub usability tasks

Time-on-task and confusion rates highlighted decision-making friction

Strategic Recommendations

Shift from Company-First to Project-First Discovery

Introduce a structured project catalog showcasing completed work, materials, sizes, and high-quality imagery to better align with how users evaluate remodeling options.

Standardize Company Information

Implement consistent company profile structures to enable easier comparison and improve trust.

Clarify Content Hierarchy

Reorganize promotional and informational sections to clearly differentiate company offerings from general content.

Decoclub design recommendations

Project-first discovery model with standardized comparison structure

Reflection

Testing revealed that users approached the platform as a source of inspiration and comparison, not simply as a directory of companies. This misalignment clarified why conversion was lower than expected.

Although the recommendations were not implemented due to budget constraints, the research provided actionable direction and strengthened my approach to diagnosing usability friction through structured evaluation.

This project reinforced the value of task-based testing for uncovering behavioral patterns. Observing how users naturally approached comparison and decision-making revealed fundamental mismatches between platform structure and user intent—insights that wouldn't have surfaced through interviews alone.

Continue Exploring

Park Street

Centralizing compliance-driven workflows in a regulated B2B SaaS platform.

View Case Study →

GotGame

Using research to reshape participation mechanics in an early-stage competition app.

View Case Study →